It is bad, between the busted culverts, the down trees and the snow or the snowdrifts, you are right a lot of spots will not be accessible until later.Stuka wrote:I was up camping over the weekend. SOOO many things closed. Quite a few camp sites still closed. Either because of damage or trees that needs to be cut down (There is an epidemic of dead fir trees at higher altitudes). Some places wont be open until next year, which sucks.
HAHA!!!! Love it.ShagWagon wrote:Well, they could have dropped all the cash 4 clunkers cars in the dam breach.
How are these even related? The department of forestry has nothing to do with ANY dams.tedlovesjeeps71 wrote:Don't worry. They will spend all their borrowed budget on fixing the dam. Trails etc will have to wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, but California operates in the red, for years. If it weren't for federal monies they would have more than issues with a dam and some trail access. Unfortunately they often choose to spend that money on other programs and agendas.Stuka wrote:How are these even related? The department of forestry has nothing to do with ANY dams.tedlovesjeeps71 wrote:Don't worry. They will spend all their borrowed budget on fixing the dam. Trails etc will have to wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
None of these trails are funded by state money. Its ALL federal, as they are in national forest land.tedlovesjeeps71 wrote:No, but California operates in the red, for years. If it weren't for federal monies they would have more than issues with a dam and some trail access. Unfortunately they often choose to spend that money on other programs and agendas.Stuka wrote:How are these even related? The department of forestry has nothing to do with ANY dams.tedlovesjeeps71 wrote:Don't worry. They will spend all their borrowed budget on fixing the dam. Trails etc will have to wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OkStuka wrote:None of these trails are funded by state money. Its ALL federal, as they are in national forest land.tedlovesjeeps71 wrote:No, but California operates in the red, for years. If it weren't for federal monies they would have more than issues with a dam and some trail access. Unfortunately they often choose to spend that money on other programs and agendas.Stuka wrote:
How are these even related? The department of forestry has nothing to do with ANY dams.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk