35s for stock 79 waggy?

Modified FSJ Tech Area

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Ok. Nooby question of the day.
Just bought a stock 79 Wagoneer, with tow package and low range. Parked for the last fifteen years. I'm starting the rehab process in hopes of some semblance of reliability by summer. In the mean time, I dream about the fun stuff that will come after I get it squared away, that is, lift, tires, gears, lockers, blah,blah,blah.
Question is, how will the quadra trac t-case hold up if I mount 35s before a re-gear? Yeah, I know the thing will be an absolute dog off the line, but let's say I'm cool with that for a while. Will it be too much stress on the T-case though? Even if I keep it on the street? Thanks for reading.

rocklaurence
Vendor
Posts: 2569
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:53 am

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by rocklaurence »

The larger tires wont stress the transfer case. Your biggest issue will be fitting 35's on the rear.
User avatar

Markstrimaran
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 4:21 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Markstrimaran »

Rear leaf springs from a F-250.
To move the rear axle back an inch of two.
Then the rear passenger doors will not interfere with.
User avatar

Markstrimaran
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 4:21 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Markstrimaran »

Need parts, I am selling my project build Fsj.
High steering, lockers, 6.2 diesel, trany, T case.
88 FSJ, runs on 360 gas, snow plow.
16" Fsj 5.5x6 alum rims.
Spare leaf over axle, yokes rotated and re welded.
6.5 turbo Diesel, dana 60 k3500 axles.
Need cash due to illness

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Yeah, I'm planning on a 6 inch lift whether I go with 33s or 35s. 35s of course will require some trimming, even with the lift. Main thing I'm concerned about is stress on the drive train. I know the axles could take it what with the tall gears and wimpy stock engine, but the t-case makes me worried, it being the borg warner 1339. If the thing blows, there's no turning it off and running 2WD.

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Thanks, markstrimaran. Can't afford much in the way of parts at the moment.
User avatar

tgreese
Posts: 7195
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Medford MA USA

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by tgreese »

Why do you believe the Quadratrac is so weak? The Quadratrac exploding reportedly results when the chain is very loose and folds over. Any component can be vulnerable when required maintenance is neglected. Have you measured your chain slack? I believe there's no evidence to suggest that the BW13xx is any weaker than any other aluminum case transfer case.
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS/PDB, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination A/Ts, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
Dual Everything: '15 Chryco Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk, ECO Green
Blockchain the vote.
User avatar

fulsizjeep
Moderator
Posts: 5012
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:21 am
Location: Fruitville, FL
Contact:

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by fulsizjeep »

Hi, welcome to the madness.

I have reliable QT info on a link in my signature. It's old but reliable. The QT is very reliable if maintenance is kept up. They put them in all makes of FSJ including the J20.

1) I personally do not like the part time conversion for QTs and have my reasons. If you are going to lock the front and rear axle, the stock QT will not like that. It puts more wear and tear on the brake cones and cone washers. It would be better to have a part time kit with the lockers.

2) I am not sure I would run 35s with a QT and D44 axles. I have run 33s no problem. With 35s, NP208 and D44s I have learned the axle shafts are the weak point and have chromoly axle shafts to install now.

3) I have ridden in a couple FSJs with 6" lift springs. It is too stiff for my liking. You will still need to trim sheet metal to run 33s or 35s. From the sound of your desires, I recommend Spring Over Axle on the front and Shackle Flip kit for the rear. With that you use stock springs. It is roughly a 6" lift and you still need a trim on 33s or 35s.
Flint Boardman
88 GW, 401/727/208, 5" lift, D44s/4.10s/locked up, 35s
https://jubileejeeps.org/quadratrac

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Thanks for the replies. I'm not necessarily convinced the bw 1339 is weak or anything, but I remember reading posts in the past theorizing that it might be a bad idea to run 35s with stock gears and the 1339, that it might make the case work extra hard. Was skeptical of this, but didn't want to do something stupid. I plan on doing mods in increments, being on a rather tight budget. And yes, chrome molly axles are planned. Fulsizejeep, I imagine you are referring to Wally when you mention d44s and 35s. How has your experience been with that set up? Bern running stock axles? Wally is a cool build. Good stance.

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Sorry, misspell. Not " bern". "Been" running stock axles.
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11812
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Stuka »

Yogi wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:20 am Thanks for the replies. I'm not necessarily convinced the bw 1339 is weak or anything, but I remember reading posts in the past theorizing that it might be a bad idea to run 35s with stock gears and the 1339, that it might make the case work extra hard. Was skeptical of this, but didn't want to do something stupid. I plan on doing mods in increments, being on a rather tight budget. And yes, chrome molly axles are planned. Fulsizejeep, I imagine you are referring to Wally when you mention d44s and 35s. How has your experience been with that set up? Bern running stock axles? Wally is a cool build. Good stance.
Stock gears (either 3.07 or 3.54 for that year) and 35" tires will put more stress on the transfer case and u-joints. But, if the t-case is in good mechanical shape, you should be ok. If its not, the first thing you will notice is a popping sound when under load, like starting from a stop on a steep hill. You go to accelerate, and you will hear/feel a popping sound. This is the sound of the chain slipping on one of the gears.

The only time I have heard of a QT case breaking is if the chain breaks. And this same thing will happen to any chain driven t-case.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Could a 79 have 3.54 gears? I was under the impression that it would be 3.31 for the tow package. 3.54 would be great!
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11812
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Stuka »

Yogi wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:37 am Could a 79 have 3.54 gears? I was under the impression that it would be 3.31 for the tow package. 3.54 would be great!
80-91 had 2.72 and 3.31 gear options. 74-79 was 3.07 and 3.54 (excluding J20's).
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Stuka, thanks, thats great to know!
User avatar

tgreese
Posts: 7195
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Medford MA USA

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by tgreese »

Stuka wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 3:02 pm ... 74-79 was 3.07 and 3.54 (excluding J20's).
These numbers are given in the '79 TSM, which is free to read and download here - https://oljeep.com/edge_parts_man.html
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS/PDB, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination A/Ts, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
Dual Everything: '15 Chryco Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk, ECO Green
Blockchain the vote.

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Thanks for the link. Mucho info. Glad I joined the forum.
User avatar

fulsizjeep
Moderator
Posts: 5012
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:21 am
Location: Fruitville, FL
Contact:

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by fulsizjeep »

Yogi wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:20 am Fulsizejeep, I imagine you are referring to Wally when you mention d44s and 35s. How has your experience been with that set up? Bern running stock axles? Wally is a cool build. Good stance.
Yes. Stock worked good until I twisted a rear axle shaft. Chromoly shafts going in this Spring.
Flint Boardman
88 GW, 401/727/208, 5" lift, D44s/4.10s/locked up, 35s
https://jubileejeeps.org/quadratrac

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Maybe I should start a new thread for this question, but I'll ask anyway. Fulsizejeep and others have said that a 6 inch suspension lift has a nasty ride, and not much flex as I understand. Question is, how would a 4 inch spring lift with 2 inch body lift perform? Better ride and flex? Any difference as far as how much fender trimming would be necessary, the one being all spring, the other being spring and body combo?
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11812
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Stuka »

Personally I hate body lifts. They introduce other issues.

But it should be known, a six inch lift will still require trimming to run 35’s. I had a six inch lift and 34’s barely cleared at full stuff with timing to the fold in the fender flares.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ

Topic author
Yogi
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:15 pm

Re: 35s for stock 79 waggy?

Post by Yogi »

Yeah, body lifts certainly aren't everybody's cup of tea. Just kicking around ideas. Unfortunately, I don't have the wherewithal to pull off soa.
Post Reply