Excessive positive camber

Stock FSJ Tech Area
Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

On my 77J10 I’ve been battling excessive positive camber for a long time. Just replaced the ball joints and the problem is now much, much worse. If I understand the system correctly camber can’t be adjusted on this style system.

So, how do you fix it? It’s wearing the outer edge of the tires out at an alarming rate.
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!

SJTD
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 12:02 pm
Location: Lompoc, Sunland or somewhere between

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by SJTD »

Have you had the toe checked. Too much will wear the outside of the tread.
Sic friatur crustulum

'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
User avatar

Yeller
Posts: 1530
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:54 am
Location: Rogers County Oklahoma

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Yeller »

How much is too much? Really need to see alignment numbers to know. As stated, toe will cause all sorts of problems
The bus I ride is so short it is a yellow Smart Car full of squirrels, monkeys and clowns.

1970 J2500 Resto Mod
https://www.fsjnetwork.com/forum/viewt ... 12&t=21395

1974 Bronco “Broncno”
https://classicbroncos.com/forums/threa ... st-3411909
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Stuka »

If you could post a print out of the alignment sheet, it would help a lot.

I have seen negative camber as the result of bent C's or tubes. Positive is a strange issue.

As for adjusting the camber, its done via offset ball joints if it needs to be done.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ

rocklaurence
Vendor
Posts: 2569
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:53 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by rocklaurence »

Yeah, what Stucka said. Something is bent. You can address some of the Camber issue via the Caster adjustment by moving the position relative to center--center of the wheel to the point on the road I should say.
User avatar

tgreese
Posts: 7172
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Medford MA USA

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by tgreese »

Have you measure the tube angle with a magnetic angle finder? The tubes should be coaxial.
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS/PDB, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination A/Ts, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
Dual Everything: '15 Chryco Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk, ECO Green
Blockchain the vote.
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

I guess the first step should be getting it on an alignment rack.
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!
User avatar

devildog80
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:41 pm
Location: Apache Junction AZ

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by devildog80 »

Check youtube how to check/adjust camber, as there are lots of folks who own these old trucks, who do their own sucessfully.

Not all that hard to do!
'81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift
'84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift
Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified
User avatar

Yeller
Posts: 1530
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:54 am
Location: Rogers County Oklahoma

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Yeller »

Grand_Wag_85 wrote: Fri Jul 22, 2022 10:03 am I guess the first step should be getting it on an alignment rack.
With alignment numbers we can certainly guide you the right direction.

I do a lot of my own alignments but on stuff I road drive a lot I still have it checked to check my work, I'm usually within tolerance close, but sometimes I miss stuff or have a poor reference point.
The bus I ride is so short it is a yellow Smart Car full of squirrels, monkeys and clowns.

1970 J2500 Resto Mod
https://www.fsjnetwork.com/forum/viewt ... 12&t=21395

1974 Bronco “Broncno”
https://classicbroncos.com/forums/threa ... st-3411909
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

Truck is currently at the shop and going in on Tuesday for a proper diagnostic
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

Just got the truck back, here are the measurements.

Image

Another silly alignment question. The steering wheel is now off center and the truck feels very darty. Are these two related?
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!
User avatar

tgreese
Posts: 7172
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Medford MA USA

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by tgreese »

If they changed the toe-in, they should center the steering. Part of the alignment. I'd take it back.

What's the factory spec for each of these? You can find it at the end of the chapter for Steering and Suspension in the TSM. I would check those against the values their machine says are nominal.
Tim Reese
Maine beekeeper's truck: '77 J10 LWB, 258/T15/D20/3.54 bone stock, low options (delete radio), PS/PDB, hubcaps.
Browless and proud: '82 J20 360/T18/NP208/3.73, Destination A/Ts, 7600 GVWR
Copper Polly: '75 CJ-6, 304/T15, PS, BFG KM2s, soft top
GTI without the badges: '95 VW Golf Sport 2000cc 2D
Dual Everything: '15 Chryco Jeep Cherokee KL Trailhawk, ECO Green
Blockchain the vote.
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Stuka »

You were toed way out before, which basically makes the vehicle understeer more, which results in a less precise steering feel. You are now toed in. Which will make initial turn in more direct. Compared to how it was before, it probably will feel more "darty", but thats more inline with how it should be from the factory.

As tgreese mentioned, they should have centered the steering wheel. The alignment machine actually checks that. They put a reflector on the steering wheel and the machine checks to see if its centered. So, they obviously skipped that part. Its a very easy fix if you wanted to do it yourself. But its worth asking them too since they should have done it anyway.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Yeller
Posts: 1530
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 7:54 am
Location: Rogers County Oklahoma

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Yeller »

I would be very happy with the final alignment numbers. Is does need a bit more camber and is probably aggravating the darty feel. I’m sure with the toe out it was even worse looking. If you want to fix the camber this will let you do that, will require resetting the toe after install.

https://www.amazon.com/Specialty-Produc ... B000JZSLT8

Also play with tire air pressure, too much or too little will create a darty condition.
The bus I ride is so short it is a yellow Smart Car full of squirrels, monkeys and clowns.

1970 J2500 Resto Mod
https://www.fsjnetwork.com/forum/viewt ... 12&t=21395

1974 Bronco “Broncno”
https://classicbroncos.com/forums/threa ... st-3411909
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

Definitely going to go back to get the wheel straightened out.

If I was to do the ball joint shims, is the install procedure the same as the stock ones? IE: torque to 50FT LBS and forget it or is there an additional procedure? Also, can these be done without dropping the knuckles? I don’t see any reason why not since they go from the top but I could be wrong.
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Stuka »

They are orientation specific. But otherwise are similar to installing regular balljoints.

With negative camber on a solid axle, it most likely means you have bent C's or the housing itself is tweaked. Not entirely uncommon for a 40 year old truck.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

Stuka wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:54 pm They are orientation specific. But otherwise are similar to installing regular balljoints.

With negative camber on a solid axle, it most likely means you have bent C's or the housing itself is tweaked. Not entirely uncommon for a 40 year old truck.
Makes sense. The previous owners were definitely not overly kind to it and I’ve put it thru some hell myself.
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!

SJTD
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 12:02 pm
Location: Lompoc, Sunland or somewhere between

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by SJTD »

Odd that you had neg toe (and camber) but were wearing the outside of the tires.
Sic friatur crustulum

'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
User avatar

Topic author
Grand_Wag_85
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Excessive positive camber

Post by Grand_Wag_85 »

SJTD wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:00 pm Odd that you had neg toe (and camber) but were wearing the outside of the tires.
Right!
82 J10
77 J10 Golden Eagle 401
88 GW

You know it's bad when your car is on the EPA's 10 most wanted list!
Post Reply