Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Typically transverse engines have enough differences that it can be a pain to make them longitudinal. This normally involves oiling differences to deal with the different directional forces the engine will see, plus accessories and such.
With so many engine options out there, this would not be the one to choose. Plus you would need a standalone ECU for it since you would not be able to use the transmission.
I was thinking the same thing as Stuka. I really like the Northstar engines, but they built the car around it. With all the other options for modern rollerized aluminum MPFI engines (gm=cheap/easy, Ford=Michigan pride, Hemi=nuff said) there's no reason for a Northstar that stands up to any scrutiny.
79 J-10 (Honcho Mucho) KE0LSU
304/Performance Fuel Injection TBI/MTA1/SP2P/Magnum rockers
T18/D20/D44s&4.10s/33" Mud Claws
Grizzly Locker Rear
4" front spring drop, 5" rear shackle flip
Chevy style HEI (ECM controlled)
Dolphin "Shark" gauges in a fancy homemade oak bezel
3/4 resto, rotting faster than I've been fixing it.
But modern engines tend to be very tightly integrated. Some, like the GM truck/corvette engines have the aftermarket support. Others like Ford and Chrysler to a lesser extent. Cadillac, not so much.
If you really want to do it, there is always a way. But you're signing up for a lot of money and difficulty.