ya same here.srobertsfsj wrote:Im here lurking, just have a lot going on.
ya same here.srobertsfsj wrote:Im here lurking, just have a lot going on.
If you only knew the half of it!bigun wrote:A novel thing for you EH!ScottsMojo wrote:(Takes a deep breath) Ahhhhhh...
Its nice to be able to hear myself think again! :p
Traffic is certainly the key to keeping it going. And even now that IFSJA is back up, traffic here is still triple what it was last week.Blake wrote:I like this site (wish it was vbulletin) and plan to post some tech on here (If yall don't mind my junk being on here). The ifsja is apparently owned by some absentee landlords and is liable to go offline at anytime. Great moderators tho
We need more traffic over here so we can keep the tech going.
Thinking about creating a build thread for the TBI installation. I have a feeling I'll be doing some engine work too...
Yeah, its EXTREMELY nice to be able to quickly log on from anywhere. Especially if you break down and need a hand diagnosing or something.RockSteady wrote:I'm here for good, too. The tapatalk thing has got me. Don't have to be by the computer to see what you guys are saying.
X2, but this site is nice, I like the other jeep tech section, that is separate from off topic. I also agree 100% on the tapatalk function. Its now one of the first things I check on my iphone. There are also so many smilies but we are missing this onecarnuck wrote:Creatures of habit. I post both places.... because I can! Muahahahahah!
FlatFourVW wrote:I got a sense immediately that problems/suggestions here were attended to (Brandon rocks!) more than the other site. Also this site is visually and operationally more pleasing to me. Me being a nitpicky internet dork can't grasp that the most populous/popular FSJ forum doesn't even have a favicon by its name for easy bookmark identification. The IFSJA site just looks...so Y2K. And it never appeared that change or suggestions were welcomed. Maybe I'm way off base.
I'll still search FSJ for tech, but I will be here daily.
CHECKlindel wrote:And the explanations as to why get old after 10+ years.
Lindel, I understand where the limitations stem from. I was speaking more to the lack of effort on the owner's part and how little can get done because of that. I apologize for not being clear enough. You and the others have never been anything short of excellent.lindel wrote:
It's not because we don't want to act on some suggestions, a lot of suggestions we CAN'T act on. And the explanations as to why get old after 10+ years.
It'll continue to look "Y2K" until it really does keel over and die, we can't do anything with it.
Absolutely. The amount of information and comraderie is fantastic over at IFSJA despite the technical ups and downs.lindel wrote: As for me (and the rest of the Mods there...) I'm kind of obligated to be there. A labor of love if you will.
I fixed that for yaTad wrote:Run, trip, fall...with scissors
X2rstep wrote:Glad it's back up,but been here awhile and like it here.Remember the site before it went down and very glad Brandon brought it back for us.