Thanks for that. There was a handshake and verbal assurance. That means I'm committed. Probably for the best. The other job may have a higher hourly rate, but there are things more important than money.will e wrote:If the job offer you have to take the drug test for was not given to you in writing or with a handshake and assurance that the drug test was all you need to pass to be employed then you are not committed to the first offer.
will e wrote:I guess life is better if you are not moving too fast.
You said in four words what would've taken me fifty.TUDrewser wrote:Pride usually screws people.
Why the beard thing again? That had nothing to do with this situation.TUDrewser wrote:Some hills are worth dying on, some are not. Choose carefully. For you, the beard "hill" is worth it. Fine by me. Just saying time tends to bring reason to people's minds, and it's always good to go into a situation with an open mind and not have your mind made up already. Will E's given all good advice (even if the situation didn't work out). I say give the meeting a shot, then make up your mind. Pride usually screws people.
Yup, I agree. Although, I thought I had a fish on the plate this time. But, yeah.DarkMonohue wrote:... there's not much point trusting in firm handshakes and steely gazes. From here forward, my philosophy would be this:
All lines in the water until the fish is on the plate.
Ha, I just read the whole thing for the first time, so for me it wasn't a month ago For the record, there is something awesome about a good beard. I envy those who can grow them. I have to settle for my middle-age dad goatee. Was just pointing out it is important to you.Southern Gorilla wrote:Why the beard thing again? That had nothing to do with this situation.
will e wrote:I guess life is better if you are not moving too fast.
See, I don't consider it a matter of pride. I'd never say I'm proud of my beard because it's just hair. I'm only proud of things I've accomplished. Which, admittedly, isn't much. I consider it a matter of respect. To me, it's massively disrespectful to tell another human being they need to change the way they look because you don't like it. It's basically a declaration of ownership. Like saying, "I'm so much better than you that I get to override your decisions about how you dress".TUDrewser wrote:Showing up to the meeting with your mind made up that you aren't going to take the job back because of how they treated you is another display of pride. You have to choose if it's another line you aren't willing to cross. And again, I don't care one way or the other...you brought it up, so I'm just offering a bit of advice. If it were me, I wouldn't burn the bridge.
We all have to take pride in something so I will revise my statement. Too much pride will screw you. Up to you to decide where that line of "too much" is.
Fair enough. But I think you should be proud of your beard.Southern Gorilla wrote:See, I don't consider it a matter of pride. I'd never say I'm proud of my beard because it's just hair. I'm only proud of things I've accomplished. Which, admittedly, isn't much. I consider it a matter of respect. To me, it's massively disrespectful to tell another human being they need to change the way they look because you don't like it. It's basically a declaration of ownership. Like saying, "I'm so much better than you that I get to override your decisions about how you dress".TUDrewser wrote:Showing up to the meeting with your mind made up that you aren't going to take the job back because of how they treated you is another display of pride. You have to choose if it's another line you aren't willing to cross. And again, I don't care one way or the other...you brought it up, so I'm just offering a bit of advice. If it were me, I wouldn't burn the bridge.
We all have to take pride in something so I will revise my statement. Too much pride will screw you. Up to you to decide where that line of "too much" is.
They originally called this process "orientation" because the goal was to get drivers to know people and people to know drivers. Great plan. Seriously. But then this morning he said I didn't co-operate and do what was expected of me in my "training". There's a big difference between "orientation" and "training". For them to think that a sixteen-year trucking veteran needs training on how to wrap pallets is basically the same thing as a hospital training a veteran surgeon on how to apply Band-aids. Or training a veteran welder on how to operate a grinder. Basically saying, "we know you have all this experience at this job, but you're obviously an idiot who needs to be shown the most basic things again."
If I were to go forward with them from here I would never be able to trust them to come to me if there was a problem. They've shown me that they will use any minor misunderstanding to justify coming down on me without first giving me a chance to address the issue.
will e wrote:I guess life is better if you are not moving too fast.
I was, before I trimmed it down to its current form.TUDrewser wrote:Fair enough. But I think you should be proud of your beard.
Yup, I've seen those wrappers. Very handy. Still not as handy as the three automated wrappers they have at this place though.Stuka wrote:if the #1 does offer the job, I would seriously take it. You need the work, and you want a house. Once you have the job, you can always look for others. But I would not let what happened stop me from accepting the job.
PS: At one of my previous jobs we had this thing that the spool of wrap was on so that we didn't have to bend down to wrap the pallets. It was a back saver.
Where I work we are instructed to only confirm employment. We do not give out any information about why a separation occurred. Even if a potential employer requests it. Who is requesting this information from them? They should be going directly to the HR of your previous employer. If you have proof you may have a lawsuit.Southern Gorilla wrote:Yup, I've seen those wrappers. Very handy. Still not as handy as the three automated wrappers they have at this place though.Stuka wrote:if the #1 does offer the job, I would seriously take it. You need the work, and you want a house. Once you have the job, you can always look for others. But I would not let what happened stop me from accepting the job.
PS: At one of my previous jobs we had this thing that the spool of wrap was on so that we didn't have to bend down to wrap the pallets. It was a back saver.
Now I have a new issue to deal with. Seems my previous employer is putting misleading information down in the "reason for leaving" part of the work history confirmations they send out. No wonder I'm not getting calls about applications I know I'm qualified for. I shoulda known the supervisor was lying when he said he'd "watch out" for me in my job hunt. Just sleazy.
I guess the few places I apply at are checking. I've been passed over for jobs I am eminently qualified for. But yesterday the temp agency I've been working for called to ask me about the information in question. I don't know if it just appeared or if it's been there the whole time and they just didn't care about it before. But I know it cost me a $17/hr assignment yesterday because after they called about it I haven't heard from them again about anything. So now I may not even be working for the temp agency I had been working with for the past three months. I'm not sure I have any chance of getting work because of this new development.will e wrote:Where I work we are instructed to only confirm employment. We do not give out any information about why a separation occurred. Even if a potential employer requests it. Who is requesting this information from them? They should be going directly to the HR of your previous employer. If you have proof you may have a lawsuit.
Turns out I was misinformed. The info is not misleading. So I have to figure out a damage-control plan.will e wrote:Do you wish to elaborate?