Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Area for Offroad Modification Tech
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by GWag89 »

I'm starting to design an anti wrap bar for my wag now that I have Chevy 63" rear Springs and plan on running 33s and a locker in the rear Dana 44.

I plan to make a traditional bar with 3 heim joints (unsure of size). Two heims mounting to the axle side and one on the shackle side. The shackle will be bolted to a hanger that is welded to the factory X member that runs underneath the rear seat. The bar itself will consist of 1.5" or 1.75" .120 -.25 wall dom . 1 main bar ruining from the shackle to the upper heim Mount on the axle bracket. And a shorter angled tube that mounts to the lower heim on the axle .

What angle do I want the traction bar for best performance? Flat? Angled with the drive shaft? Angled with the pinion?

How do the positions of the heims on the axle affect articulation?
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by GWag89 »

Here are some ideas I'm tossing around on the axle bracket. I want maximum articulation but don't want to compromise performance of its anti wrap duties.
Image
Image

There are quite a few variables that can be adjusted when designing this bracket. I'm looking for insight as to how these variables affect performance and articulation
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11811
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Stuka »

Having the upper bar over the axle would be better than having it in front. Provided you have shock and brake line clearance.

The bar will limit articulation, no real way around that. But the longer the bar is, the less of an impact it will have on articulation.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Is it better to have the shackle mounted in compression or in tention?
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11811
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Stuka »

That typically comes down to which fits and gives the best ground clearance.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Anybody have pics of your anti wrap bar setup?

What works for you? What would you change? Any and all advise is appreciated
User avatar

Tatsadasayago
Posts: 3684
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:22 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Tatsadasayago »

The main design concern is that the bar must move with the axle housing as it travels up and down and rotates during articulation.
Ideally, your bar should be centered over the axle tube and the other end mounting even with the front spring eye.
The rotation affect can be mitigated by moving the front mounting point toward the center of the axle while keeping the rear mount toward the tire. It should also be designed to maintain proper pinion angle during compression and extension if possible.
Ideally, the bar will not bind and will travel in the same arc as the axle.
If you have ever seen a ladder bar setup, they hold to this design. Traction bars did a similar thing but used the forward area of the leaf spring and a contact point instead of a solid mounting location further forward. The kind of bar design you shared is essentially a ladder bar with only the upper tubing. That's a bad thing for a straight line drag car but good for a wheeling rig.
4X4s add the rotation/articulation aspect so some sort of ball and socket mount at the front end eliminates the torsional binding.

If I had my CAD computer here I'd design a link setup for you, but alas I cannot.
1977 Cherokee Chief - The Blair Jeep Project III
A collection of parts flying in close formation
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Thanks for the tech. That's all good info. I like to design my own stuff if possible . But i don't like to simply copy others design without understanding the principles of the design. Knowing how is not enough. .. knowing why is the ultimate goal.

SJTD
Posts: 1932
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 12:02 pm
Location: Lompoc, Sunland or somewhere between

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by SJTD »

Take a look at Resbum's truck: http://fsjnetwork.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 1&start=20

He used two but I think the basic design is an example of what you're looking for.
Sic friatur crustulum

'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Yep resbum design is very close to my own design with only a few small differences.

I only need 1 bar

My rear suspention is built to maximize down travel so I'm thinking of mounting the shackle in tension to allow the axle more droop.

I had planned on using heims on the axle side but am undecided because of price. Not sure if 2x the $$ buys 2x the performance or durability

SJTD
Posts: 1932
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 12:02 pm
Location: Lompoc, Sunland or somewhere between

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by SJTD »

Idunno why he used two other than a single one might offend one's sense of symmetry.

In this application it seems to me they don't see much movement so maybe cheaper is adequate?

I don't see where the front to back mounting of the arm at the axle makes any difference. The vertical spacing needs to be enough for adequate stiffness. You are simply making a rigid truss. I'm not sure you even need the spherical ends at the rear. They won't allow the bar to twist relative to the axle. They would allow side to side movement. Maybe polyurethane spring ends would be good enough.
Sic friatur crustulum

'84 GW with Nissan SD33T, early Chev NV4500, 300, narrowed Ford reverse 44, narrowed Ford 60, SOA/reversed shackle in fornt, lowered mount/flipped shackle in rear.
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Anyone running a traction bar want to chime in?
User avatar

68glad
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: stayton, oregon

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by 68glad »

Here's mine. (Pay no attention to the wd40 overspray :)) 8" separation between upper & lower bolts. 48" long. Homemade poly bushings on axle end and a heim on the shackle end. I don't think heims are needed on the axle end. At least on mine. The amount of swivel needed isn't as mutch as it appears. Got one on the front also. Driving at the dunes through some whoops, without transfer case shifter boot, and about loaded my britches when I saw how much the frontend actually moves. I had this face... :shock:
edit: bottom bar matches driveline angle.
Image

Image

Front.
Image

Image


Image
68 Gladiator- RIP
78 Wagoneer- 401, D60/70, 203/205, 38's, Dual PS pump, Hydroboost, OBA, OBW, bla bla bla.

If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Post by GWag89 »

Thanks 68glad. I think I've decided on poly bushings for the axle end and a heim on the shackle

I'm going to try to keep the top bar flat and the lower bar angled with the drive shaft but let it hang an inch or so lower to act as a slider.

Still undecided on shackle orientation?
User avatar

Jerry Blair
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Batavia, OH

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Jerry Blair »

I my traction bar on my YJ was built similar to 68glad's. I used what I had in the scrap pile so the axle end used rubber bushings from a track bar and the shackle end uses two rod ends mounted in threaded DOM. I mounted the shackle so that the pulled on it going forward and pushed in reverse.

This bar worked perfectly and controlled wheel hop from soft YJ springs SOA, 37" Krawlers and a warmed-over 302HO.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

AwesomeJ10
Posts: 3031
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:26 am
Location: Off the grid on Storm Mountain Colorado
Contact:

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by AwesomeJ10 »

Jerry Blair wrote:I my traction bar on my YJ was built similar to 68glad's. I used what I had in the scrap pile so the axle end used rubber bushings from a track bar and the shackle end uses two rod ends mounted in threaded DOM. I mounted the shackle so that the pulled on it going forward and pushed in reverse.

This bar worked perfectly and controlled wheel hop from soft YJ springs SOA, 37" Krawlers and a warmed-over 302HO.
Very nice YJ and very nice traction bar.

Just last week I built a traction bar on my wifes YJ and it came out very similar to yours. The whole jeep is built pretty much like yours, except I do have a 14 bolt back there :) :fsj:

To the OP.

Save yourself some time and $$$ and look at some of ruff stuff's stuff. https://www.ruffstuffspecialties.com/ca ... TMAIN.html

I built my first traction bar in the Honcho a few years ago with stuff I had laying around in the garage and it works GREAT, but I've since bent the main part that welds on the axle and need to redo it all. I wish I had went with ruff stuff from the beginning. I did on my YJ and it worked out real good.
User avatar

Jerry Blair
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Batavia, OH

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Jerry Blair »

Blake wrote:
Very nice YJ and very nice traction bar.

Just last week I built a traction bar on my wifes YJ and it came out very similar to yours. The whole jeep is built pretty much like yours, except I do have a 14 bolt back there :) .

Thanks, it is "the one that got away!" I regret selling it every time I see a pic!

AwesomeJ10
Posts: 3031
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:26 am
Location: Off the grid on Storm Mountain Colorado
Contact:

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by AwesomeJ10 »

Jerry Blair wrote:
Blake wrote:
Very nice YJ and very nice traction bar.

Just last week I built a traction bar on my wifes YJ and it came out very similar to yours. The whole jeep is built pretty much like yours, except I do have a 14 bolt back there :) .

Thanks, it is "the one that got away!" I regret selling it every time I see a pic!

oh yeah. I built an '88 GW a couple of years ago, threw a ton of money into, axles, atlas, tires, etc and then practically GAVE IT AWAY just so I could fund the purchase of my wifes TJ.

boy do I miss that thing and I definitely know how you feel.
User avatar

Topic author
GWag89
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:34 am
Location: Lynchburg VA

Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by GWag89 »

Here are some options I'm tossing around. I will give full credit to WRO for the adjustable link. Since I'm running 63" Springs with d44s larger axles and more lift is likely so adjustability is key if I want to use the same bar.
Image

You may notice the shackle hanger has 4 holes for adjustment. That is there so I can adjust the mounting point when I move my axle.
Image
User avatar

Jerry Blair
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Batavia, OH

Re: Traction/ anti wrap bar design questions

Post by Jerry Blair »

GWag89 wrote:Image
I like options 1 and 2. Those are the strongest. The other designs that have one bar much longer than the other will be prone to bending. When I built my bar it looked a lot like #3. I used 3/16 plate to sandwich the longer bar all the way from the Y to the shackle. I had seen previous examples bend on designs used by competition rock crawlers back in the day.
Post Reply