Thanks! Now I know what to look for in the junk yards!Trex20165 wrote:Yes, the finned cover is stock for the Isuzu axle.
The Isuzu uses smaller bearings as I recall. Which is probably why there is a difference. That or the way its measured is different.csuengr wrote:I had the idea of putting one under my WT Cherokee. I found one problem. GAWR for my AMC 20 was 3200 lbs. The GAWR or the Isuzu D44 was 2400 or 2600 lbs.
Ahh ok, that explains the difference.pcoplin wrote:Stuka, if I remember right, the 95s had a pretty small width, like 58 inch, 96-97 had around 60, and 98+ had the wider 63 inch.
That makes it sound similar to the new-gen rear D44 used in JK's. 8.9" ring gear, MUCH larger pinion (D60 sized), thicker tubes, and bigger bearings. Webbing looks similar too now that I look closer.Trex20165 wrote:According to the specs section of Cars.com, the 2000 Rodeo has a 2,900 lbs. rear (GAWR).
The axle tubes are larger (just over 3") than the AMC20, the wheel studs are slightly larger (metric) and longer, and it has a 29 spline yoke. The replacement yoke I had to order was a 29-spline for a Dana 60 (larger seal surface).
So it may be rated lighter but it certainly looks and seems heavier duty. Guess I will find out when I get to Uwharrie in June.
So, are you folks saying this a stronger, better axle than the stock M23?Stuka wrote:That makes it sound similar to the new-gen rear D44 used in JK's. 8.9" ring gear, MUCH larger pinion (D60 sized), thicker tubes, and bigger bearings. Webbing looks similar too now that I look closer.Trex20165 wrote:According to the specs section of Cars.com, the 2000 Rodeo has a 2,900 lbs. rear (GAWR).
The axle tubes are larger (just over 3") than the AMC20, the wheel studs are slightly larger (metric) and longer, and it has a 29 spline yoke. The replacement yoke I had to order was a 29-spline for a Dana 60 (larger seal surface).
So it may be rated lighter but it certainly looks and seems heavier duty. Guess I will find out when I get to Uwharrie in June.
A JK rear D44 (Don't bother with the front, very weak tubes, although a ProRock housing fixes that) is much stronger than an FSJ D44 or M23. The Rubi JK rear D44 even has larger 32 spline shafts. The R&P are quite a bit larger (Especially the pinion). They also have larger bearings, both inner and outer.The PIG Smith wrote:So, are you folks saying this a stronger, better axle than the stock M23?Stuka wrote:That makes it sound similar to the new-gen rear D44 used in JK's. 8.9" ring gear, MUCH larger pinion (D60 sized), thicker tubes, and bigger bearings. Webbing looks similar too now that I look closer.Trex20165 wrote:According to the specs section of Cars.com, the 2000 Rodeo has a 2,900 lbs. rear (GAWR).
The axle tubes are larger (just over 3") than the AMC20, the wheel studs are slightly larger (metric) and longer, and it has a 29 spline yoke. The replacement yoke I had to order was a 29-spline for a Dana 60 (larger seal surface).
So it may be rated lighter but it certainly looks and seems heavier duty. Guess I will find out when I get to Uwharrie in June.
The JK's don't as far as I know. I know the bolt diameter is larger on the JK carrier/ring gear, and the part numbers for the bearings are different. But other bearings may be usable. The standard D44 carrier would have to be drilled out though. Also, JK D44's only have one carrier. No carrier break. 3.21-5.38 use the same carrier.jamesdart wrote:does it use the same carrier as an earlier 44? id like to one day replace my offset qt 44