Meanwhile back at the ranch

Modified FSJ Tech Area
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Ive had a 'tick' in my top end lately so decided to check it out today and replace the pushrods while I had it opened up. As expected #6 had a BENT pushrod.
But what's puzzling me is the wear pattern on the exhaust valve rotators. It looks like the valve stem is too deep into the rotator and this has polished the inner edge of the rotator and worn the rocker somewhat. Something's not right, any ideas?
Oh yes, I almost forgot to mention I broke the obligatory rocker bridge.
Are steel bridges still available or am I stuck with POS aluminum replacements?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Bueller?


Bueller? :-?
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by Stuka »

I am not sure on the wear. It does seem strange.

And I swear I have seen steal bridges some place for sale. I just cannot recall where.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

The wear is strange, indeed. #8 was the only cyl that didn't exhibit that wear pattern. I wonder if it has the wrong valve stem locks?

And I found steel bridges @ RockAuto. :-bd

I guess some teardown and investigation is in order as this could be a source of my valvetrain noise.
User avatar

fulsizjeep
Moderator
Posts: 5012
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:21 am
Location: Fruitville, FL
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by fulsizjeep »

Not sure about the wear pattern on that one valve. Sounds and looks like a valve job is in order. I have changed to steel bridge on one of ours. Be generous with assembly lube when you install them.
Flint Boardman
88 GW, 401/727/208, 5" lift, D44s/4.10s/locked up, 35s
https://jubileejeeps.org/quadratrac
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Thanks Flint. The engine is fairly fresh, prolly about 60K on it, and it to me looks like the relationship between the valve stem/rotator/stem lock. I don't think wear would affect that relationship, but I could be wrong.
Looking around this morning I see that Sealed power makes exhaust valves with one locking groove and another with four locking grooves. Why? I wonder if this is to accommodate running valves with or without the rotator?
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Welp, you fella's are of no help. I thought this is where all the experts came to hang out... :mrgreen:

Just kidding. I'm not in the mood to pull heads as Schwag runs so strong. I think I will just massage all the exhaust rockers for clearance. If this engine was gonna bust it would have done it miles ago. :-bd
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

I stopped by the machine shop that rebuilt my engine back in 199X and discussed what I was seeing. Consensus was that the valve stems around the keepers were wearing and that could be the cause of the retainer wear. Although this engine was built about 15 years ago, it has relatively low mileage as it was drydocked in my garage for 10 of those years. Pulling the springs will tell...

So, IMO it begs to question the logic of using stock parts when rebuilding an engine. Scale of economy almost demands it, but if building anything above the stock spec this should be scrutinized. I now wish I knew where the build sheet was after 10+ years, a deeevorce and two moves!
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by Stuka »

Did the shop mention if its something to be concerned about immediately, or if it could go on like that for a while without the risk of blowing something up?

Although I suppose if the keeper failed, you could end up with a very loud, bad sound.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

They didn't seem too concerned but I think I will pull some springs and have a look at what's going on.

All this has me thinking I should find another set of heads and build them how I want them and be done with it. Until I find something else to throw cash at! :)
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Buttoned Schwag up last night and fired her up. Valvetrain noise is still there but missing the racket of the bent pushrod scrubbing up and down the side of the head.

So its time to build a set of heads. I'm tired of listening to the constant tick tick tick...
User avatar

Stuka
Site Admin
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:53 pm
Location: CA
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by Stuka »

Heh, my J10 has had an off and on ticking for about 40k miles. But being that its getting close to 250k, I am not overly concerned with it. If it goes, just put a new engine in.
2017 JKU Rubicon
Pevious Jeeps: 1981 J10, 1975 Cherokee, 2008 JK, 2005 KJ, 1989 XJ
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Lol if my mileage was anywhere close to ours I would take the ticking as a sign that the valvetrain was still intact!
I guess I'm a little peeved about it all.
User avatar

carnuck
Posts: 3881
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:48 pm
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by carnuck »

You can change the keepers without pulling the heads. I've done it with soft rope in the cyl through the plug hole, or compressed air and my overhead spring compressor.
Check my parts for sale near Seattle
User avatar

lindel
Posts: 923
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Tool, TX

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by lindel »

Search through the tech articles. I did a write up on a poor man's valve stem seal replacement using rope.
Lindel
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

Yea I've replaced keepers and seals with the heads on so I am familiar with that. The problem is that its the valve stems that are wearing (speculation) as they are not hardened like the keepers. So I don't think changing the keepers is going to affect much, but correct me if I'm wrong. I would love it to be as simple as replacing keepers!
User avatar

carnuck
Posts: 3881
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:48 pm
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by carnuck »

I'm wondering if maybe the wrong keepers were put on (not the first time I've seen that)
Check my parts for sale near Seattle
User avatar

Topic author
ScottsMojo
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:37 pm
Location: Casa de Ducati North
Contact:

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by ScottsMojo »

carnuck wrote:I'm wondering if maybe the wrong keepers were put on (not the first time I've seen that)
I think it deserves a look, I asked the guys at the shop about that but the answer was that there was no way they could have put the wrong locks in, of course...
User avatar

whsii
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:01 pm
Location: Frankfort, KY

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by whsii »

Stuka,

Your tick might be the cam and lifters. The 258 cams were soft and wore badly.

Mine had only 81K on it when rebuilt, the lobes were much smaller than speck., most of the lifters were hollowed out on the bottom. It had a tick at times...

I believe the bridges are the same for the I6 as the 360, mine were available at NAPA.

I would look at the rocker arms, where it seems to be polishing the keeper ring. The rockers are stamped steel, I would feel that they are softer than the valve stems. if they are worn, it is a cheep replacement going with new stock rockers. I think I had thirty five dollars in rockers and bridges for the I6.

Just a thought.
User avatar

swampedge
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: Melbourne,Fl.

Re: Meanwhile back at the ranch

Post by swampedge »

Did you measure the installed height of the springs? Were they in spec? If so then you can add a simple lash cap to the end of the valve stem and not look back. It looks to me like the valves were to short from the get go. If you had oiling issues that bad to cause that you would have more problems than that plus the engine would have had that familiar "smell of death" in it when you pulled the valve covers.
Jim
You really are judged by the dogs you have!
Post Reply